After a secondhand fashion show "Metamorphosis"

Last evening I attended a student-led fashion show at George Washington University called Metamorphosis — a secondhand fashion event where every garment on the runway had been thrifted, altered, or repurposed. The show was joyful and inventive, a celebration of what clothing can become when imagination replaces consumption. Woven through the evening was something more meaningful: a presentation by GoodWeave International, a nonprofit founded by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Kailash Satyarthi, dedicated since 1994 to ending child and forced labor in global supply chains. Thirty years of work. Eleven thousand two hundred and fifty children freed. One hundred and ten thousand given access to education. Numbers that should not have to exist.

I left the show unable to stop thinking about the distance — the enormous, mostly invisible distance — between a garment on a runway and the hands that made it.

"We Workers Are Also Human"

In November 1970, a twenty-two-year-old Korean garment worker named Jeon Tae-il stood at the entrance of Seoul's Peace Market and set himself on fire. His final words — "We workers are also human!" — were not a metaphor. They were a literal plea. More than ninety percent of the garment workers in that market at the time were teenage boys and girls, working sixteen to eighteen-hour shifts in factory floors so cramped that tuberculosis spread like weather. Wages were paid in amounts smaller than the price of a cup of coffee. Amphetamines were injected to keep underfed workers awake. These were not the conditions of a distant past or a foreign regime — they were the conditions of an industry producing clothing for a modernizing world.

"Shockingly, similar injustices persist in 21st-century America — not in a distant country, but in Los Angeles, in factories producing clothes sold in the same malls where we shop."

Made in America — But at What Cost?

Over half of garment factories in Los Angeles have been found to violate minimum wage laws. Many workers are underpaid — or not paid at all — under what is called the "piece rate" system: wages calculated not by the hour but by the number of garments completed. On the surface, this sounds neutral. In practice, it means that when production quotas are impossible to meet — because the quotas are set by brands demanding faster and cheaper — workers effectively earn below minimum wage for hours of their labor, with no recourse. If a factory is caught, owners have been documented closing the operation and reopening under a new name, resetting their liability and leaving workers unpaid.

The workers most vulnerable to this system are undocumented immigrants, who face a cruel arithmetic: report the theft and risk deportation, or endure it and survive. The brands at the top of the supply chain — the ones whose names are on the label — often claim ignorance of conditions several tiers below them. This ignorance is not innocent. It is purchased, deliberately, through the deliberate opacity of global supply chains.

The Secondhand Shop and the Brand-New Tags

Recently, browsing a secondhand shop, I stopped in front of a rack that unsettled me: garment after garment, brand new, tags still attached. Zara. H&M. Names synonymous with the promise of fashion at the speed of trend and the price of convenience. Someone had bought these things and never worn them. Or they had been donated in bulk by a retailer offloading excess inventory. Either way, they arrived at the secondhand shop before being worn even once — and the secondhand shop is supposed to be the safety net, the place where discarded things get a second chance before the landfill.

The average garment today is worn seven times before it is discarded. Seven. The mathematics of fast fashion are staggering when you follow them to their end: the microplastics shed by synthetic fabrics in every wash cycle, accumulating in waterways and eventually in human tissue; the toxic dyes discharged into rivers in countries where environmental regulation is weak and labor is cheap; the mountains of unsold or barely-used textile waste that no recycling system is currently equipped to absorb at scale. These are not the externalities of an unusual industry. They are the deliberate operational model of an industry that has decided the true cost of a garment should be paid by someone other than the consumer, and somewhere other than the price tag.

What "Metamorphosis" Proposed

Against all of this, a group of GW students put on a secondhand fashion show and called it Metamorphosis. The title was well chosen. Metamorphosis is not repair — it is transformation into something genuinely new, a change of form so complete that the original is not diminished but transcended. Every garment on that runway had been given exactly this: a second form, a continued life, a refusal to become waste.

I think about the hands that made the clothes on that runway — the original hands, whoever they were, wherever they worked. They do not know their labor ended up here, on a student runway at a university in Washington, D.C., repurposed and celebrated. There is something worth sitting with in that fact: that the person who sewed a seam in a factory somewhere — possibly underpaid, possibly very young — contributed to something that would eventually be treated with enough care to be preserved and transformed. Not all clothing gets this. Most does not. But this did.

Practical steps toward responsible consumption

Buy secondhand first. Thrift stores, consignment shops, and peer-to-peer resale platforms extend a garment's life and reduce demand for new production. The GW "Metamorphosis" model — thrift, alter, wear — is available to all of us.
Ask who made your clothes. The Fashion Revolution movement's annual "Who Made My Clothes?" campaign invites consumers to demand supply chain transparency from brands. A brand's response — or silence — is itself information.
Look for the GoodWeave label. When buying rugs, home textiles, and garments, the GoodWeave certification indicates independent verification that child and forced labor were not used. It is one of the few supply chain standards backed by actual inspection.
Wear what you own more. The single most powerful consumer action is extending the life of garments already in your possession. Seven wears is the current average. Thirty is achievable for almost any garment with basic care.
Support policy, not just purchasing. Individual consumer choices matter, but structural change requires regulation — mandatory supply chain disclosure, living wage standards, and enforcement of labor law at every tier of production. Support legislators and organizations working on these issues.
Learn the history. Jeon Tae-il's story is not a Korean story or a 1970 story. It is a story that is still happening, in different languages, in different cities. Knowing it makes it harder to look away.

The Seam Between Knowing and Doing

The garment industry is one of the largest employers in the world — and one of the most exploitative. These two facts are not unrelated. The scale that employs hundreds of millions of people also makes accountability easy to obscure and reform easy to defer. No individual consumer can fix this alone, and the framing of fast fashion as primarily a consumer responsibility problem is itself a strategy — a way of deflecting attention from the brands and policies that create the conditions in the first place.

But individual consumers are not powerless, either. The secondhand economy is growing precisely because enough people decided, individually and then collectively, that they wanted a different relationship with clothing. That decision aggregates. It sends a signal. It funds a different model.

Jeon Tae-il set himself on fire so that someone would hear. Fifty-five years later, his words — we workers are also human — are still waiting to be fully answered. A fashion show called Metamorphosis, on April 17, 2026 evening in Washington, D.C., is a small piece of that answer. It is not enough. But it is a beginning — which is, in the end, what every metamorphosis requires.

*Jeon Tae-il (전태일), 1948–1970

Korean garment worker and labor activist. Jeon worked in Seoul's Cheonggyecheon clothing district from the age of seventeen, witnessing firsthand the exploitation of young workers — twelve-hour days, wages below subsistence, and factory conditions that produced mass illness. His self-immolation on November 13, 1970 galvanized the Korean labor movement and remains a defining moment in the history of workers' rights. He was twenty-two years old.

Jeon Tae-il statue in Cheonggyecheon, Seoul. Photo credit: Korea.visitkorea.or.kr

✦ ✦ ✦

Search This Blog

My Korean-American Life